People v. Hadzovic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hadzovic

225 A.D.2d 478, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3166

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D.2d 478 (People v. Hadzovic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hadzovic, 225 A.D.2d 478, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Any questions with respect to the victim’s credibility were properly placed before the jury for resolution and we find no basis to disturb its determination. The court’s Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Any questions with respect to the victim’s credibility were properly placed before the jury for resolution and we find no basis to disturb its determination. The court’s Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D.2d 478, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hadzovic-nyappdiv-1996.