People v. Hadley

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Hadley

911 N.W.2d 460

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 23, 2018

DocketSC: 154384; COA: 333652

StatusPublished

This text of 911 N.W.2d 460 (People v. Hadley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hadley, 911 N.W.2d 460 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Shiawassee County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall pay particular attention to the effect of Does #1-5 v. Snyder , 834 F.3d 696 (C.A. 6, 2016), cert. den. sub. nom. Snyder v. John Does #1-5 , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 55, 199 L.Ed.2d 18 (2017), and People v. Solloway , 316 Mich.App. 174, 891 N.W.2d 255 (2016), lv. den.

*461500 Mich 997, 894 N.W.2d 604 (2017), on the issues raised by the defendant. The motion for expedited consideration is DENIED.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Shiawassee County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall pay particular attention to the effect of Does #1-5 v. Snyder , 834 F.3d 696 (C.A. 6, 2016), cert. den. sub. nom. Snyder v. John Does #1-5 , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 55, 199 L.Ed.2d 18 (2017), and People v. Solloway , 316 Mich.App. 174, 891 N.W.2d 255 (2016), lv. den.

*461500 Mich 997, 894 N.W.2d 604 (2017), on the issues raised by the defendant. The motion for expedited consideration is DENIED.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

911 N.W.2d 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hadley-mich-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack