People v. Haddon

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Haddon

190 N.W.2d 748, 34 Mich. App. 157, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1591

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 27, 1971

DocketDocket Nos. 10889, 11079

StatusPublished

This text of 190 N.W.2d 748 (People v. Haddon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Haddon, 190 N.W.2d 748, 34 Mich. App. 157, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1591 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These two cases were consolidated by order of this Court. The defendants and a third person pled guilty to an added count of robbery unarmed. MCLA § 750.530 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §28.798).

On appeal the defendants claim it was error for the trial judge to advise them simultaneously of their rights, and to fail to advise them of their right to remain silent. The judge obtained individual responses from the defendants, and he was not required to advise them of their right to remain silent, although he did so advise defendant Haddon. People v. Jaworski (1970), 25 Mich App 540, leave to appeal granted (1970), 384 Mich 766; People v. Sepulvado (1970), 27 Mich App 66; and People v. Malcom (1970), 27 Mich App 205. The questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to require no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These two cases were consolidated by order of this Court. The defendants and a third person pled guilty to an added count of robbery unarmed. MCLA § 750.530 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §28.798).

On appeal the defendants claim it was error for the trial judge to advise them simultaneously of their rights, and to fail to advise them of their right to remain silent. The judge obtained individual responses from the defendants, and he was not required to advise them of their right to remain silent, although he did so advise defendant Haddon. People v. Jaworski (1970), 25 Mich App 540, leave to appeal granted (1970), 384 Mich 766; People v. Sepulvado (1970), 27 Mich App 66; and People v. Malcom (1970), 27 Mich App 205. The questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to require no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 N.W.2d 748, 34 Mich. App. 157, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-haddon-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack