People v. Haddock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Haddock

253 A.D.2d 891, 678 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 891 (People v. Haddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Haddock, 253 A.D.2d 891, 678 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Two appeals by the defendant from a determination of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), entered October 17, 1997, which classified the defendant under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see, Correction Law § 168 et seq.) as a level three sex offender. By order to show cause dated February 26, 1998, the defendant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals on the ground that the determination is not appealable (see, People v [892]*892Stevens, 235 AD2d 440, affd 91 NY2d 270). Separate motion by the defendant, inter alia, for leave to appeal as a poor person and assignment of counsel.

On the Court’s own motion and upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion is denied as academic.

Since there is no statutory provision upon which an appeal from the determination of the court may be predicated, the motion is granted and the appeals are dismissed (see, People v Stevens, supra).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Two appeals by the defendant from a determination of the County Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), entered October 17, 1997, which classified the defendant under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see, Correction Law § 168 et seq.) as a level three sex offender. By order to show cause dated February 26, 1998, the defendant was directed to show cause before this Court why an order should not be made and entered dismissing the appeals on the ground that the determination is not appealable (see, People v [892]*892Stevens, 235 AD2d 440, affd 91 NY2d 270). Separate motion by the defendant, inter alia, for leave to appeal as a poor person and assignment of counsel.