People v. Habersham

2017 NY Slip Op 6886, 154 A.D.3d 409, 60 N.Y.S.3d 814
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 3, 2017
Docket3951/14 4549 4548
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6886 (People v. Habersham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Habersham, 2017 NY Slip Op 6886, 154 A.D.3d 409, 60 N.Y.S.3d 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant *410 from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered October 28, 2015, as amended February 3, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 6886, 154 A.D.3d 409, 60 N.Y.S.3d 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-habersham-nyappdiv-2017.