People v. Guzman-Rincon

413 P.3d 156
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedMarch 23, 2017
DocketSupreme Court Case No: 2017SA17
StatusPublished

This text of 413 P.3d 156 (People v. Guzman-Rincon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Guzman-Rincon, 413 P.3d 156 (Colo. 2017).

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Petition for Rule to Show Cause Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, together with the briefs filed in the above *157captioned matter, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

In the absence of record support for the simultaneous denial of the defendant's unopposed motion for a continuance and the People's motion to admit the prior testimony of witness Richardson pursuant to CRE 804, the district court abused its discretion by declining to grant either.

IT IS ORDERED that the Rule to Show Cause is therefore made ABSOLUTE and the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

BY THE COURT, EN BANC, MARCH 24, 2017.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
413 P.3d 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-guzman-rincon-colo-2017.