People v. Guzman

2017 NY Slip Op 7140, 154 A.D.3d 775, 61 N.Y.S.3d 503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Guzman. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 A.D.3d 1140
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 11, 2017·No. 2015-01491·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Margulis, J.), imposed January 28, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342 [2015]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). The defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256).

Eng, P.J., Leventhal, Austin, Duffy and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Guzman, 2017 NY Slip Op 7140, 154 A.D.3d 775, 61 N.Y.S.3d 503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 7140 (People v. Guzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)