People v. Guzman

272 A.D.2d 883, 709 N.Y.S.2d 715, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5266
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate (Penal Law § 240.32). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in admitting in evidence the t-shirt and uniform shirt worn by the correction officer. Although the chain of custody was broken with respect to those items, the People’s proof provided reasonable assur[884] anees that they were the same as those worn by the correction officer and that their condition was unchanged (see, People v Miller, 242 AD2d 896, 897, lv denied 91 NY2d 876; People v Anderson, 99 AD2d 560, 561). Any deficiency in the chain of custody affects the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility (see, People v Miller, supra, at 897). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Aggravated Harassment of Employee by Inmate.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Wisner and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Guzman, 272 A.D.2d 883, 709 N.Y.S.2d 715, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 883 (People v. Guzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Montgomery
2018 NY Slip Op 351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Dye
26 A.D.3d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)