People v. Guo Fu Chen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Guo Fu Chen

263 A.D.2d 461, 691 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7723

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D.2d 461 (People v. Guo Fu Chen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Guo Fu Chen, 263 A.D.2d 461, 691 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), rendered November 8, 1996, convicting him of kidnapping in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree (three counts), attempted grand larceny in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Clabby, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s claim that the trial court unduly restricted his recross examination of the complainant. The line of questioning pursued by the defendant was beyond the scope of the preceding redirect examination of the complainant (see, People v Bethune, 105 AD2d 262).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), rendered November 8, 1996, convicting him of kidnapping in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree (three counts), attempted grand larceny in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Clabby, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s claim that the trial court unduly restricted his recross examination of the complainant. The line of questioning pursued by the defendant was beyond the scope of the preceding redirect examination of the complainant (see, People v Bethune, 105 AD2d 262).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D.2d 461, 691 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-guo-fu-chen-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack