People v. Gumbs
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), imposed May 25, 2011, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on May 18, 2001.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
[760]*760Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term which included the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; People v Louis, 90 AD3d 1075 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
105 A.D.3d 759 (People v. Gumbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.