People v. Guity

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Guity

100 A.D.3d 562, 953 N.Y.S.2d 860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.3d 562 (People v. Guity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Guity, 100 A.D.3d 562, 953 N.Y.S.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Massaro, J.), rendered July 18, 2011, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 12 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Velez, 19 NY3d 642, 647-649 [2012]; People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Massaro, J.), rendered July 18, 2011, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 12 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Velez, 19 NY3d 642, 647-649 [2012]; People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Feinman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.3d 562, 953 N.Y.S.2d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-guity-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack