People v. Guillebeaux
This text of 136 A.D.3d 1055 (People v. Guillebeaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), both imposed July 25, 2013, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Carter, 114 AD3d 960 [2014]; People v Azeez, 95 AD3d 1349 [2012]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 A.D.3d 1055, 25 N.Y.S.3d 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-guillebeaux-nyappdiv-2016.