People v. Guglielmoni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Guglielmoni

13 A.D.3d 648, 786 N.Y.S.2d 331, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15738

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.3d 648 (People v. Guglielmoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Guglielmoni, 13 A.D.3d 648, 786 N.Y.S.2d 331, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered February 20, 2003, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly conducted an inquiry to ensure that the defendant’s guilty plea and his waiver of rights, including his right to appeal, were knowing and voluntary (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 667-668 [1988]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions either are without merit or are not properly before this Court in light of his waiver of the right to appeal. Santucci, J.P., Adams, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered February 20, 2003, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly conducted an inquiry to ensure that the defendant’s guilty plea and his waiver of rights, including his right to appeal, were knowing and voluntary (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 667-668 [1988]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions either are without merit or are not properly before this Court in light of his waiver of the right to appeal. Santucci, J.P., Adams, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.3d 648, 786 N.Y.S.2d 331, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-guglielmoni-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack