People v. Gudino

134 A.D.3d 468, 19 N.Y.S.3d 886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 2015·No. 16338 4330/10·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Seth L. Marvin, J.), entered April 11, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Initially, we reject the People’s argument that, because defendant has been deported, we should decline to hear his appeal (see People v Edwards, 117 AD3d 418 [1st Dept 2014]).

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the guidelines, or did not warrant a downward departure under the totality of the circumstances, including the egregiousness of the underlying sex crime against a child. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gudino, 134 A.D.3d 468, 19 N.Y.S.3d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 468 (People v. Gudino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Shim
139 A.D.3d 68 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)