People v. Guastella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Guastella

26 A.D.2d 937, 275 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 937 (People v. Guastella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Guastella, 26 A.D.2d 937, 275 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a coram nobis proceeding, the People appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 9, 1965, which granted defendant’s application only to the extent of ordering a Huntley type hearing to determine the voluntariness of defendant’s confession. Defendant’s coram nobis application is to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered March 25, 1954, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, upon a jury trial, and imposing sentence. Appeal dismissed. In our opinion, the order sought to be reviewed is nonappealable (Code Crim. Pro., § 518; People v. Monahan, 21 A D 2d 748). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a coram nobis proceeding, the People appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 9, 1965, which granted defendant’s application only to the extent of ordering a Huntley type hearing to determine the voluntariness of defendant’s confession. Defendant’s coram nobis application is to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered March 25, 1954, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, upon a jury trial, and imposing sentence. Appeal dismissed. In our opinion, the order sought to be reviewed is nonappealable (Code Crim. Pro., § 518; People v. Monahan, 21 A D 2d 748). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 937, 275 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-guastella-nyappdiv-1966.