People v. Guarasci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Guarasci

188 A.D.2d 614, 592 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D.2d 614 (People v. Guarasci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Guarasci, 188 A.D.2d 614, 592 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered October 22, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has failed to demonstrate that there exists a significant possibility that an actual conflict of interest resulted from the joint representation of the defendant and the codefendant (see, People v Recupero, 73 NY2d 877).

Inasmuch as the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was there[615]*615after actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI