People v. Guamal
104 A.D.3d 957, 960 N.Y.S.2d 917
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed January 25, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Guamal, 104 A.D.3d 957, 960 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
104 A.D.3d 957 (People v. Guamal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)