People v. Guamal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Guamal

104 A.D.3d 957, 960 N.Y.S.2d 917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.3d 957 (People v. Guamal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Guamal, 104 A.D.3d 957, 960 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed January 25, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed January 25, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.3d 957, 960 N.Y.S.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-guamal-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack