People v. Groves

28 A.D.2d 682, 280 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3995

This text of 28 A.D.2d 682 (People v. Groves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Groves, 28 A.D.2d 682, 280 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3995 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Christ, Rabin and Nolan, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., and Benjamin, J., dissent and vote to affirm the judgments, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, the statement by the trial court followed by the sentence imposed was tantamount to the imposition of an indeterminate sentence without comment from which a determination of reformability may reasonably be inferred. The statement at bar is distinguishable from that made in People v. Jemmott (26 A D 2d 937), which, in the opinion of the majority of this court, constituted a disclaimer of any finding of reformability.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 A.D.2d 682, 280 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-groves-nyappdiv-1967.