People v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Grossman

21 A.D.2d 681, 249 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3850

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 681 (People v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Grossman, 21 A.D.2d 681, 249 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 28, 1963 [misdescribed in the notice of appeal as “a final order of the Kings County Court * 6 * as of November 29, 1963”], which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered May 22, 1959 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Order affirmed. The application was made on the ground that the sentence imposed upon defendant as a second felony offender on May 22, 1959 was illegal because, upon defendant’s first conviction on April 11, 1955, there had been no compliance with the requirements of section 480 [682]*682of the Code of Criminal Procedure. That claim may not be raised by coraw, nobis (People v. Sulivan, 3 N Y 2d 196). In any event, defendant failed to show that with respect to such 1955 conviction there had been a failure to comply with section 480 {People ex rel. Romano v. Johnston, 10 A D 2d 758, mot. for lv. to app. den. 8 N Y 2d 707). Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 28, 1963 [misdescribed in the notice of appeal as “a final order of the Kings County Court * 6 * as of November 29, 1963”], which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered May 22, 1959 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, and imposing sentence upon him as a second felony offender. Order affirmed. The application was made on the ground that the sentence imposed upon defendant as a second felony offender on May 22, 1959 was illegal because, upon defendant’s first conviction on April 11, 1955, there had been no compliance with the requirements of section 480 [682]*682of the Code of Criminal Procedure. That claim may not be raised by coraw, nobis (People v. Sulivan, 3 N Y 2d 196). In any event, defendant failed to show that with respect to such 1955 conviction there had been a failure to comply with section 480 {People ex rel. Romano v. Johnston, 10 A D 2d 758, mot. for lv. to app. den. 8 N Y 2d 707). Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 681, 249 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grossman-nyappdiv-1964.