People v. Gross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gross

58 A.D.2d 963, 397 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13165

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 28, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 A.D.2d 963 (People v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gross, 58 A.D.2d 963, 397 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County, rendered December 29, 1976, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal contempt in the first degree. A perusal of the record discloses no jurisdictional defects in the proceedings and defendant does not contest the voluntariness of his guilty plea. Accordingly, most of the issues he seeks to raise are not reviewable on this appeal. We do not find section 215.51 of the Penal Law to be unconstitutionally vague; the type of contempt involved here has a long and well understood history (see e.g., People v Ianniello, 36 NY2d 137, 142). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. merit.Judgment affirmed. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County, rendered December 29, 1976, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal contempt in the first degree. A perusal of the record discloses no jurisdictional defects in the proceedings and defendant does not contest the voluntariness of his guilty plea. Accordingly, most of the issues he seeks to raise are not reviewable on this appeal. We do not find section 215.51 of the Penal Law to be unconstitutionally vague; the type of contempt involved here has a long and well understood history (see e.g., People v Ianniello, 36 NY2d 137, 142). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. merit.Judgment affirmed. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 963, 397 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gross-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack