People v. Griswold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Griswold

284 A.D.2d 574, 725 N.Y.S.2d 239, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5994

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 574 (People v. Griswold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Griswold, 284 A.D.2d 574, 725 N.Y.S.2d 239, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered July 19, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the second degree and was sentenced, as part of a negotiated plea agreement, to an indeterminate prison term of 3 to 9 years. Defendant appeals, contending that his prison sentence is harsh and excessive. Our review of the record discloses no extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification of the sentence in the interest of justice (see, People v Shea, 254 AD2d 512; People v Powell, 234 AD2d 792). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered July 19, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the second degree and was sentenced, as part of a negotiated plea agreement, to an indeterminate prison term of 3 to 9 years. Defendant appeals, contending that his prison sentence is harsh and excessive. Our review of the record discloses no extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification of the sentence in the interest of justice (see, People v Shea, 254 AD2d 512; People v Powell, 234 AD2d 792). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 574, 725 N.Y.S.2d 239, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-griswold-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack