People v. Grisanti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Grisanti

126 A.D.2d 938, 511 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42038

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 126 A.D.2d 938 (People v. Grisanti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Grisanti, 126 A.D.2d 938, 511 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42038 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of possession of gambling records in the first degree (Penal Law § 225.20 [1]) in full satisfaction of a two-count indictment. The court levied a fine in the sum of $4,500 and sentenced defendant to a term of probation for a period of five years. As one of the conditions of defendant’s probation, the court directed that defendant must submit himself to a warrantless search of his person, his residence and his automobile at any time by his probation officer. The People concede that the warrantless search provision of defendant’s probationary sentence should be deleted as contrary to law (see, People v Suttell, 109 AD2d 249).

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the items seized from his person in accordance with the terms of a valid search warrant (see, People v Sanin, 60 NY2d 575). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J.— possession of gambling records, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of possession of gambling records in the first degree (Penal Law § 225.20 [1]) in full satisfaction of a two-count indictment. The court levied a fine in the sum of $4,500 and sentenced defendant to a term of probation for a period of five years. As one of the conditions of defendant’s probation, the court directed that defendant must submit himself to a warrantless search of his person, his residence and his automobile at any time by his probation officer. The People concede that the warrantless search provision of defendant’s probationary sentence should be deleted as contrary to law (see, People v Suttell, 109 AD2d 249).

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress the items seized from his person in accordance with the terms of a valid search warrant (see, People v Sanin, 60 NY2d 575). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J.— possession of gambling records, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 938, 511 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grisanti-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack