People v. GRIGORIAN
This text of 683 N.W.2d 143 (People v. GRIGORIAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE
v.
GRIGORIAN.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 125422. COA: 252333.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 30, 2003 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would vacate the Court of Appeals decision and remand to that Court for further consideration of whether defendant's request for counsel was ambiguous or equivocal, in light of the Wayne circuit court's factual finding that, after the defendant made the statement, "I think I need an attorney," the defendant asked to call his wife "so she can get some help."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
683 N.W.2d 143, 470 Mich. 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grigorian-mich-2004.