People v. Grignon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Grignon

186 A.D.2d 296, 587 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10612

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 17, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 296 (People v. Grignon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Grignon, 186 A.D.2d 296, 587 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered September 13, 1988, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant’s only argument on appeal is that the IV3 to 4-year prison sentence he received upon the revocation of his probation was harsh and excessive. Given defendant’s use of drugs and alcohol, failure to cooperate in a substance abuse rehabilitation program and conviction of additional crimes while on probation, we cannot say that County Court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant (see, People v Moore, 168 AD2d 739; People v Bushey, 114 AD2d 690, lv denied 67 NY2d . 649).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered September 13, 1988, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant’s only argument on appeal is that the IV3 to 4-year prison sentence he received upon the revocation of his probation was harsh and excessive. Given defendant’s use of drugs and alcohol, failure to cooperate in a substance abuse rehabilitation program and conviction of additional crimes while on probation, we cannot say that County Court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant (see, People v Moore, 168 AD2d 739; People v Bushey, 114 AD2d 690, lv denied 67 NY2d . 649).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 296, 587 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grignon-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack