People v. Griggs

176 A.D.2d 1225, 576 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13916

This text of 176 A.D.2d 1225 (People v. Griggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Griggs, 176 A.D.2d 1225, 576 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant defendant an adjournment of sentencing to give him a further opportunity to obtain the money to pay his fine and make restitution. At the plea colloquy the court clearly explained to defendant that a third indictment would be dismissed only if the fine and the restitution were paid by the time of sentencing. (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Merrell, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D.2d 1225, 576 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-griggs-nyappdiv-1991.