People v. Grigg
Opinion
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fiber, J., at trial; Rotker, J., at sentencing), rendered June 28, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
The defendant alleges that during the trial the testimony of the complaining witness was improperly bolstered (see, People v Trowbridge, 305 NY 471), and that he was accordingly denied a fair trial. This testimony was, however, properly stricken by the court and curative instructions were given to which no objection was made (see, People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969; People v Sorgente, 90 AD2d 559; People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865, 866). We have reviewed the defendant’s other [746]*746contention, and find it to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
120 A.D.2d 745 (People v. Grigg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.