People v. Griffith
Opinion
| People v Griffith |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 06129 |
| Decided on December 05, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: December 05, 2024
Before: Webber, J.P., Moulton, Mendez, Pitt-Burke, O'Neill Levy, JJ.
Ind No. 4291/17 Appeal No. 3177 Case No. 2022-01627
v
Anthony Griffith, Defendant-Appellant.
Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (John L. Palmer of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Catherine Marotta of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Kiesel, J.), rendered March 12, 2022,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: December 5, 2024
Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2024 NY Slip Op 06129 (People v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.