People v. Griffith

204 A.D.2d 567, 614 N.Y.S.2d 212
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Griffith. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D.2d 705

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered November 19, 1990, convicting him of intimidating a witness in the third degree and [568]*568criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242). Balletta, J. P., Miller, Lawrence and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Griffith, 204 A.D.2d 567, 614 N.Y.S.2d 212 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 567 (People v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)