People v. Griffith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Griffith

24 A.D.2d 1030, 266 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2641

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 1030 (People v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Griffith, 24 A.D.2d 1030, 266 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 19, 1964 after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted robbery and attempted larceny (both in the first degree) of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a gun as a felony, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The proof clearly established defendant’s guilt. While there may perhaps have been several minor errors or improprieties in the course of the trial, they were plainly innocuous and nonprejudicial, and could not possibly have affected the outcome. Hence, they should be and are disregarded (Code Grim. Pro., § 542). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 19, 1964 after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted robbery and attempted larceny (both in the first degree) of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a gun as a felony, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The proof clearly established defendant’s guilt. While there may perhaps have been several minor errors or improprieties in the course of the trial, they were plainly innocuous and nonprejudicial, and could not possibly have affected the outcome. Hence, they should be and are disregarded (Code Grim. Pro., § 542). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 1030, 266 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-griffith-nyappdiv-1965.