People v. Griffin

59 A.D.3d 1106, 872 N.Y.S.2d 302
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 6, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 59 A.D.3d 1106 (People v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Griffin, 59 A.D.3d 1106, 872 N.Y.S.2d 302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, whether defendant received an illegal sentence because of noncompliance with the statutory mandates of CPL 400.21. Upon our review of the trial court proceedings, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of December 22, 2005 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois, [1107]*1107151 AD2d 1046 [1989]). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before June 5, 2009. Present—Scudder, EJ., Hurlbutt, Smith and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GRIFFIN, DAVON, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Griffin
72 A.D.3d 1496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Borrell
909 N.E.2d 559 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.3d 1106, 872 N.Y.S.2d 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-griffin-nyappdiv-2009.