People v. Grieco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Grieco

127 A.D.2d 789, 512 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43272

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 A.D.2d 789 (People v. Grieco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Grieco, 127 A.D.2d 789, 512 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered December 14, 1982, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Sufficient corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony was provided by the tape-recorded conversations between the accomplice and the defendant (see, e.g., People v Farruggia, 61 NY2d 775, 777), as well as by the testimony of the defendant himself (see, e.g., People v Burgin, 40 NY2d 953, 954). There was, additionally, a napkin found in the robbers’ car which contained directions to the house where the robbery was to take place, and which the defendant admitted giving to someone to give to one of the robbers.

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered December 14, 1982, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Sufficient corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony was provided by the tape-recorded conversations between the accomplice and the defendant (see, e.g., People v Farruggia, 61 NY2d 775, 777), as well as by the testimony of the defendant himself (see, e.g., People v Burgin, 40 NY2d 953, 954). There was, additionally, a napkin found in the robbers’ car which contained directions to the house where the robbery was to take place, and which the defendant admitted giving to someone to give to one of the robbers.

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 789, 512 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grieco-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack