People v. Grider

3 P. 492, 2 Cal. Unrep. 285, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 779
California Supreme Court·Decided March 14, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MYRICK, J.

The information accused the defendant and one Donovan of the crime of grand larceny. That the defendant Grider took the money from the pocket of Carmody when the latter was intoxicated is admitted. The proposition of Grider was that certain persons engaged in a “game” were endeavoring to obtain the money by means of the game, and that he (Grider) took it as a friend of Carmody to protect it for him. On the other hand, the theory of the prosecution seems to have been that Grider took the money feloniously, with intent to steal it, making use of the other idea as a pretext or as an afterthought. In that view the ruling of the court and the instructions were correct.

No error appearing, the judgment and order are affirmed.

We concur: Thornton, J.; Sharpstein, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grider, 3 P. 492, 2 Cal. Unrep. 285, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 779 (Cal. 1884).

3 P. 492 (People v. Grider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Territory of Arizona v. Dowdy
124 P. 894 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1912)