People v. Grenardo

2018 NY Slip Op 847
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2018
Docket2016-05617
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 847 (People v. Grenardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Grenardo, 2018 NY Slip Op 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Grenardo (2018 NY Slip Op 00847)
People v Grenardo
2018 NY Slip Op 00847
Decided on February 7, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 7, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
L. PRISCILLA HALL
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2016-05617
(Ind. No. 799/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Elden Grenardo, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Sean H. Murray of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Thomas Ross of counsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), imposed April 26, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264; People v Johnson, 135 AD3d 960) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v Jordan, 153 AD3d 1433; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, HALL, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Johnson
135 A.D.3d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Jordan
2017 NY Slip Op 6663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grenardo-nyappdiv-2018.