People v. Greiner

256 A.D.2d 1132, 684 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14242
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and declaration of delinquency dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court’s finding that defendant violated a condition of probation is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, CPL 410.70 [3]). The People failed to establish that defendant operated his employer’s motor vehicle in violation of the limitations of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1198 (9). Furthermore, contrary to the People’s contention, the record does not establish that the court, in granting defendant’s request for a post-revocation conditional license, did not intend that defendant be given the benefit of section 1198 (9). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Tills, J. — Violation of Probation.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Hayes, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Greiner, 256 A.D.2d 1132, 684 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 1132 (People v. Greiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DETTELIS, JOHN, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016