Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Greenidge

People v. Greenidge

695 N.E.2d 715, 91 N.Y.2d 967, 672 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1014
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 30, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 695 N.E.2d 715 (People v. Greenidge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Greenidge, 695 N.E.2d 715, 91 N.Y.2d 967, 672 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1014 (N.Y. 1998).

Opinion

*969 OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determinations relating to the seizure of defendant, the search of the pouch he was carrying and the removal of objects from the pouch all involve mixed questions of law and fact that are supported by evidence in the record. Consequently, the determinations are beyond further review by this Court. Defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Jimenez
8 N.E.3d 831 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
In re Darryl C.
98 A.D.3d 69 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Cruz
643 N.E.2d 636 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 N.E.2d 715, 91 N.Y.2d 967, 672 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-greenidge-ny-1998.