People v. Greenfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Greenfield

100 A.D.2d 752, 474 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Greenfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Greenfield, 100 A.D.2d 752, 474 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Dontzin, J.), rendered May 12,1983, convicting defendant of the crime of [753]*753advertisement and sale of unauthorized recordings of sound and sentencing him to 100 hours of public service in addition to a fine of $1,000, affirmed. U Defendant’s plea of guilty constituted a waiver of the claim that section 275.10 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because of the Federal supremacy clause of the United States Constitution and preemption by the Federal Copyright Act (US Code, tit 17). In light of the waiver we find it unnecessary to pass on the claim of pre-emption. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Silverman, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Dontzin, J.), rendered May 12,1983, convicting defendant of the crime of [753]*753advertisement and sale of unauthorized recordings of sound and sentencing him to 100 hours of public service in addition to a fine of $1,000, affirmed. U Defendant’s plea of guilty constituted a waiver of the claim that section 275.10 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because of the Federal supremacy clause of the United States Constitution and preemption by the Federal Copyright Act (US Code, tit 17). In light of the waiver we find it unnecessary to pass on the claim of pre-emption. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Silverman, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 752, 474 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-greenfield-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack