People v. Greene

151 A.D.2d 1033, 544 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8389
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Greene. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 A.D.2d 439

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude from our review of the record that the prosecutor’s opening statement complied with CPL 260.30 (3) (see, People v Adams, 139 AD2d 794, 795; People v Parker, 97 AD2d 620, 621). Further, though there were defects in the prosecutor’s opening statement, they did not so prejudice defendant as to require a new trial (see, [1034]*1034People v De Tore, 34 NY2d 199, 207-208, cert denied sub nom. Wedra v New York, 419 US 1025; People v Campos, 138 AD2d 500).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Darrigrand, J. — manslaughter, second degree; petit larceny.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Greene, 151 A.D.2d 1033, 544 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8389 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

151 A.D.2d 1033 (People v. Greene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. De Tore
313 N.E.2d 61 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Parker
97 A.D.2d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Campos
138 A.D.2d 500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Adams
139 A.D.2d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Wedra v. New York
419 U.S. 1025 (Supreme Court, 1974)