People v. Greene

78 A.D.2d 904, 433 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13663
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 12, 1978, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The postarrest statements made by defendant in response to the arresting officer’s inquiry should have been suppressed due to the officer’s failure to first advise him of his Miranda rights (see People v Whyte, 71 AD2d 631). However, we find that the proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming. Moreover, “there is no reasonable possibility that the error might have contributed to defendants conviction” (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230,237) or that the admission into evidence of defendant’s statements contributed thereto (People v Almestica, 42 NY2d 222,226). Thus, this error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Greene, 78 A.D.2d 904, 433 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

78 A.D.2d 904 (People v. Greene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hall
176 A.D.2d 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Moolenaar
88 A.D.2d 1093 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)