People v. Green

2018 NY Slip Op 7269
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 A.D.3d 1055
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 2018·No. 7490 3519/13·Published

Opinion

People v Green (2018 NY Slip Op 07269)
People v Green
2018 NY Slip Op 07269
Decided on October 30, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 30, 2018
Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn, Oing, Singh, JJ.

7490 3519/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Dushawn Green, Defendant-Appellant.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Amy Donner and Justine M. Luongo of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Susan Gliner of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered May 28, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one to three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Because "[d]efendant said nothing [at] the plea colloquy or . . . sentencing proceeding that negated an element of the crime," the narrow exception to the preservation rule does not apply (People v Pastor, 28 NY3d 1089, 1090-1091 [2016]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]).

At sentencing, defendant mentioned that he did not steal anything at the time of the burglary to which he had pleaded guilty. The court appropriately advised defendant that burglary did not require an actual theft, but only the intent to commit a crime such as larceny, whereupon defendant said nothing further. Accordingly, there was no need for any further inquiry. The court was not required to inquire into other statements that defendant made in presentence interviews (see e.g. People v Rojas, 159 AD3d 468 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 31 NY3d 1086 [2018]). In any event, the plea allocution establishes the voluntariness of the plea.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 30, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Green, 2018 NY Slip Op 7269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 7269 (People v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pastor
68 N.E.3d 42 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)