People v. Green

128 A.D.3d 541, 8 N.Y.S.3d 560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 A.D.3d 915
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 2015·No. 15159 9378/98·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anthony J. Ferrara, J.), entered September 27, 2013, which denied defendant’s Correction Law § 168-o (2) petition to modify his sex offender classification, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded to Supreme Court for a hearing before a different Justice.

Under the circumstances presented, the court erred in refusing to permit defendant to appear at the hearing via video conferencing (see Correction Law § 168-0 [4]; People v Marquez, 124 AD3d 741 [2d Dept 2015]). We remand the matter for the court to conduct a hearing with defendant’s participation, if he chooses, in person or, given the undisputed health limitations on his ability to travel, via video conferencing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Green, 128 A.D.3d 541, 8 N.Y.S.3d 560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

128 A.D.3d 541 (People v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Marquez
124 A.D.3d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)