People v. Green

272 A.D.2d 341, 708 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leach, J.), rendered July 31, 1996, convicting him of [342]*342criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his argument concerning the prosecutor’s cross-examination of one of his witnesses by failing to make timely, specifically tailored objections during trial (see, People v Hernandez, 260 AD2d 399, 400). In any event, the record supports the trial court’s determination that the prosecutor “adequately demonstrated his good faith and possessed a sufficient basis for asking the challenged question [s]” (People v Kass, 25 NY2d 123, 126; People v Sealy, 167 AD2d 362, 363). Moreover, the trial court instructed the jury that questions alone are not in evidence. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Green, 272 A.D.2d 341, 708 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 341 (People v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ferguson
15 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Vitiello
285 A.D.2d 480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)