People v. Green

174 A.D.2d 575
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 A.D.2d 768

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.), rendered August 1, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, inter alia, that his guilt of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree. The record indicates that the defendant and another individual sold cocaine to an undercover officer and further establishes that the defendant was an active participant in the sale. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or lacking in merit. Kooper, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Green, 174 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

174 A.D.2d 575 (People v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)