People v. Green

86 A.D.2d 962, 448 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15657
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 A.D.2d 650

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: After he had been arraigned and assigned counsel on an unrelated matter, defendant was interrogated and a confession obtained on the instant charge in the absence of his assigned counsel. People v Rogers (48 NY2d 167) prohibits questioning under those circumstances and requires suppression of the statement. Although the Rogers rule was not in effect at the time of defendant’s arrest, the rule has been given retroactive effect (People v Albro, 52 NY2d 619, 624). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Bergin, J. — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Simons, J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Green, 86 A.D.2d 962, 448 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

86 A.D.2d 962 (People v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rogers
397 N.E.2d 709 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Albro
422 N.E.2d 496 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)