People v. Greeman
This text of 235 A.D.2d 281 (People v. Greeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.), rendered October 1, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, which established that, sharing the intent of his cohorts and acting as a lookout, [282]*282defendant intentionally aided their theft and possession of the victim’s purse.
The prosecutor adhered to the court’s Molineux ruling, which had permitted elicitation of the fact that the officer knew defendant, and did not suggest to the jury that defendant had engaged in prior misconduct, or had prior contact with law enforcement. Defendant’s remaining claims concerning prosecutorial misconduct are without merit.
There was no basis for counsel to request either a Wade hearing or a circumstantial evidence charge, and counsel’s failure to do so did not deprive defendant of effective assistance. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D.2d 281, 652 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-greeman-nyappdiv-1997.