People v. Grayton
This text of 22 A.D.3d 598 (People v. Grayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered February 6, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his constitutional right to be present at a material stage of the trial was not violated (see People v Morales, 80 NY2d 450, 455-457 [1992]; People v Babb, 226 AD2d 469, 470 [1996]; People v Chicas, 204 AD2d 476, 476-477 [1994]).
The Supreme Court properly admitted into evidence photographs depicting the shirt worn by the murder victim (see People v Pobliner, 32 NY2d 356, 369-370 [1973], cert denied 416 US 905 [1974]; People v Collic, 285 AD2d 514, 515 [2001]; People v DeBerry, 234 AD2d 470, 470-471 [1996]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.3d 598, 801 N.Y.S.2d 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grayton-nyappdiv-2005.