People v. Grayson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Grayson

305 A.D.2d 425, 758 N.Y.S.2d 515

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 425 (People v. Grayson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Grayson, 305 A.D.2d 425, 758 N.Y.S.2d 515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered April 28, 1999, convicting him of murder in the first degree (five counts), murder in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree (eight counts), burglary in the second degree (four counts), assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree (six counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts), and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[426]*426Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]). Altman, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered April 28, 1999, convicting him of murder in the first degree (five counts), murder in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree (eight counts), burglary in the second degree (four counts), assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree (six counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts), and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[426]*426Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]). Altman, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 425, 758 N.Y.S.2d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grayson-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack