People v. Gray

129 A.D.3d 1101, 10 N.Y.S.3d 882
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gray. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 A.D.3d 909
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 2015·No. 2013-08546·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), imposed August 21, 2012, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree (nine counts), and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being periods of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate terms of imprisonment previously imposed on March 29, 2004.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to include the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-633 [2011]; People v Harrison, 112 AD3d *1102 967, 968 [2013]; People v Hernandez, 110 AD3d 918, 919 [2013]; People v Rogers, 105 AD3d 776, 777 [2013]).

Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gray, 129 A.D.3d 1101, 10 N.Y.S.3d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

129 A.D.3d 1101 (People v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Rogers
105 A.D.3d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Hernandez
110 A.D.3d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)