People v. Gray
265 N.E.2d 464, 27 N.Y.2d 850, 316 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1001
This text of 265 N.E.2d 464 (People v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Gray, 265 N.E.2d 464, 27 N.Y.2d 850, 316 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1001 (N.Y. 1970).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed. Although the prosecutor overextended himself in establishing the identity of defendant as the same Furman Gray who had been previously convicted of a robbery, in the face of defendant’s denials, any error, if error there was, was not prejudicial (see Code Crim. Pro., § 542).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 N.E.2d 464, 27 N.Y.2d 850, 316 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gray-ny-1970.