People v. Gray CA2/5

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 11, 2015
DocketB259582
StatusUnpublished

This text of People v. Gray CA2/5 (People v. Gray CA2/5) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gray CA2/5, (Cal. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Filed 2/11/15 P. v. Gray CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE, B259582

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA094864) v.

STANLEY GRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark C. Kim, Judge. Dismissed. Murray A. Rosenberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. Defendant, Stanley Gray, purports to appeal from a drug conviction. On May 9, 2014, defendant pled guilty to a drug charge. Defendant’s probable cause certificate issuance request was denied. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction on our own motion. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) Thus, we issued an order to show cause concerning possible dismissal of the appeal and placed the matter on calendar. Defendant has failed to fully and timely comply with both Penal Code section 1237.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b). (In re Chavez (2003) 30 Cal.4th 643, 651; People v. Mendez (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1084, 1099; People v. Way (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 733, 736.) Without a probable cause certificate, defendant cannot appeal. (People v. Kaanehe (1977) 19 Cal.3d 1, 8; People v. Ribero (1971) 4 Cal.3d 55, 61; People v. West (1970) 3 Cal.3d 595, 600-601; People v. Ward (1967) 66 Cal.2d 571, 574-576.) The appeal is dismissed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

TURNER, P. J.

We concur:

KRIEGLER, J.

GOODMAN, J.*

* Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. West
477 P.2d 409 (California Supreme Court, 1970)
People v. Ribero
480 P.2d 308 (California Supreme Court, 1971)
Jennings v. Marralle
876 P.2d 1074 (California Supreme Court, 1994)
Olson v. Cory
673 P.2d 720 (California Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Ward
426 P.2d 881 (California Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Kaanehe
559 P.2d 1028 (California Supreme Court, 1977)
People v. Way
6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 644 (California Court of Appeal, 2003)
In Re Chavez
68 P.3d 347 (California Supreme Court, 2003)
People v. Mendez
969 P.2d 146 (California Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Gray CA2/5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gray-ca25-calctapp-2015.