People v. Gravlin

217 N.W.2d 404, 52 Mich. App. 467, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 1057
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 29, 1974
DocketDocket 17257
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 217 N.W.2d 404 (People v. Gravlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gravlin, 217 N.W.2d 404, 52 Mich. App. 467, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 1057 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant, William G. Gravlin, *468 was arrested on September 29, 1964, and charged with murder in the first degree. MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548. On January 14, 1965, defendant was adjudicated incompetent to stand trial and committed to Ionia State Hospital. Three years later defendant was adjudicated competent to stand trial. He was tried and convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison, without receiving any credit for the time he spent in custody.

On appeal defendant contends that he should have been given credit against his sentence for the time spent in jail and in custody at Ionia State Hospital prior to his sentence. We agree.

The statute in effect at the time of defendant’s commitment to Ionia (MCLA 767.27; MSA 28.967) was amended effective March 10, 1967, by 1966 PA 266. A section of the amended statute, MCLA 767.27a(9); MSA 28.966(11)(9) requires:

"Time spent in custody under subsections (3), (5), (6), (7) and (8) shall be credited against any sentence imposed on the defendant in the pending criminal case or in any other case arising from the same transaction. The statute of limitations on the pending criminal charge or any other charge arising from the same transaction shall commence to run on the entry of an order of commitment under subsection (5) of this section and shall continue to run until and unless the committing court determines under subsection (8) that the defendant is competent to stand trial.”

Section 3 of the act states that persons presently committed to Ionia State Hospital are subject to the provisions of this 1966 amendatory act. Therefore, the time defendant spent in custody at Ionia must be credited against his sentence.

The same result is required under MCLA 769.11b; MSA 28.1083(2) which states:

*469 "Whenever any person is hereafter convicted of any crime within this state and has served any time in jail prior to sentencing because of being denied or unable to furnish bond for the offense of which he is convicted, the trial court in imposing sentence shall specifically grant credit against the sentence for such time served in jail prior to sentencing.”

This statutory provision is remedial and should be liberally construed to effectuate the statutory purpose sought to be achieved by the Legislature in its enactment. People v Cohen, 35 Mich App 706; 192 NW2d 652 (1971); People v Potts, 46 Mich App 538; 208 NW2d 583 (1973).

A "jail” means a place of confinement and a mental hospital is such a place. A defendant must be given credit against his sentence for time spent in confinement pursuant to governmental authority, regardless of the place of confinement. People v Noble, 26 Misc 2d 903; 207 NYS2d 467 (1960).

This case is remanded to the Oakland County Circuit Court with instructions to grant the defendant credit against his sentence for the days spent in confinement since the date of his arrest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

TATIS v. State
716 S.E.2d 203 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2011)
People v. Resler
532 N.W.2d 907 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1995)
State v. Tal-Mason
492 So. 2d 1179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State v. Nagle
492 N.E.2d 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Greene
378 N.W.2d 553 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Burton Smith
372 N.W.2d 660 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Winchell
371 N.W.2d 514 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Chamberlain
358 N.W.2d 572 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1984)
Trecker v. State
320 N.W.2d 594 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1982)
Lock v. State
609 P.2d 539 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1980)
Hart v. State
588 S.W.2d 226 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Stange
283 N.W.2d 806 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1979)
Bartrug v. Commonwealth
582 S.W.2d 61 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1979)
State v. MacKley
552 P.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1976)
State v. La Badie
534 P.2d 483 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Ervin Thomas
226 N.W.2d 734 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Groeneveld
221 N.W.2d 254 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 N.W.2d 404, 52 Mich. App. 467, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gravlin-michctapp-1974.